WebDec 21, 2024 · This rule is derived from Fed.R.Civ.P. 35. Rule 35 was amended, effective 3/1/1990. The amendments are technical in nature and no substantive change is intended. Rule 35 was amended, effective3/1/1994, to track the 1991 federal amendment, by authorizing the court to require a physical or mental examination conducted by any … WebThe appellants filed a notice of intention to oppose the main application. Prior to filing their answering affidavit, the appellants filed a notice in terms of Uniform rule 35(12), seeking the production by the respondents of seven documents they considered they were entitled to.
CR 26 GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING DISCOVERY (a) …
WebDiscovery in the High Court is regulated by Rule 35 and in the Magistrate's Court by Rule 23. HIGH COURT (R35) When? Close of Pleadings or earlier with leave from the court. Reply 20 court days after receipt of request to discover. Which documents? Documents and tape recordings in one's possession. WebRule 35. Physical and Mental Examinations. (a) Order for an Examination. (1) In General. The court where the action is pending may order a party whose mental or physical condition—including blood group—is in controversy to submit to a physical or mental … The present discovery rules are structured entirely in terms of individual discovery … can not bathing cause hair loss
Legal Forms and Templates - Facilegis - Legal Forms and Templates
WebOn 28 November 2014 and in response to the defendants' notice in terms of Rule 35(1), the plaintiff served its discovery affidavit and listed in part one of the First Schedule the following documents: 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.6 6.7 All pleadings, 20674/2014 including annexures under Case Number Newspaper article. WebAs amended through February 1, 2024. Rule 35.01 - Order for examination. When the mental or physical condition (including the blood group) of a party, or of a person in the custody or under the legal control of a party, is in controversy, the court in which the action is pending may order the party to submit to a physical or mental examination ... Web4.3 The High Court duly ordered compliance with the Companies’ Rule 35(12) notice. However, it dismissed the Companies’ compelling application in respect of their notice in terms of Rule 35(11)-(14).7 4.4 The Companies were not content to proceed on the basis of the documents obtained pursuant to their partial victory. fizzy whizz toasted marshmallow